This is indicative of higher cognitive effort and more difficulty ignoring the penis as opposed to the vulva. Attributing female gender when a penis was present was associated with longer total dwell time, unlike attributing male gender with a vulva shown. Total dwell time depended on whether the gender attribution was made in line with the depicted genital, if the genital was a penis. Eye tracking revealed that overall most dwell time as a proxy for important information was dedicated to the head, chest and genital areas of all the stimuli. Also, male gender was ascribed more often when the penis was present than was female gender when the vulva was shown. In line with the original results we found that the genital attribution contributed immensely to the gender attribution. Applying the ethnomethodological approach originally used, participants were asked to decide for each stimulus whether they saw a man or a woman and to indicate subjective confidence with the decision. The stimuli shown varied in the composition of gender cues: from those more commonly associated with maleness to associated with femaleness. To further investigate the underlying decision processes we applied eye tracking. We used digital reproductions of the original stimuli to replicate their findings in the current social context. In their foundational work on the social construction of gender, Kessler and McKenna (1978) investigated the relationship between gender attribution and genital attribution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |